About Me

Name:Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Leslie Bennetts is An Example of Why Some Men Avoid Marriage

Leslie Bennetts, contributing editor to Vanity Fair and an author of a book urging women not to raise their own children, had an opinion piece published on Mother’s Day in the Los Angeles Times.

This morning, millions of proud mothers will be presented with special, homemade breakfasts by their beaming children. There will be Mother's Day presents and cards, including precious handmade creations from the kids and joking or romantic ones from Dad.

But then the world, having made its annual perfunctory nod to the contributions of American mothers, will move on, leaving us once again to cope with our inordinate responsibilities, largely on our own.

Have to seen low little attention Father’s Day gets in comparison?

Those responsibilities - and the personal sacrifices they typically entail - generate a permanent state of simmering anger in all too many women.

I’d be angry too if magazines had told me I could “have it all” without any sacrifices, and I believed them, and then I found out that reality was different.

Last month, a Washington Post review of my new book asked why it is that so many mothers are so angry.

Some are angry because they expected someone else to take care of their every need and want, they expected their kids would be like pets, and they expected they would have the freedom to pursue – or not – the career of their choice, and when those expectations are not fulfilled, anger is the result.

After noting that lack of sleep doesn't fully explain this pervasive phenomenon, the writer suggested that motherhood represents the first time most women run headfirst into fundamental inequities - not just the biological differences between men and women but also the disproportionate burdens imposed by a culture that still regards the raising of children as the mother's responsibility.

I don’t think raising children insonly the mother’s responsibility.  But the burden is on women to choose a man who will be there for their children.  They can not simply have sex with any man they choose and will him into being a good father.  It isn’t going to happen.  Now, most women who marry do so to a man who earns more, and they expect him to provide her with a certain lifestyle.  He needs to work in order to do that, and that often means long hours away.  Money doesn’t grow on trees.

The result is often a painful collision between family needs and workplace realities. Even all these years after the women's movement emerged, working mothers must still confront the intransigence of a corporate culture whose extreme hours, inflexible structures and hostility toward caretaking needs can make the juggling act very difficult.

Employers hire people to do jobs.  They don’t hire them to give them a place to hang out while their kids are in school.  Raising children is a choice.  I recall that “feminists” are big on children being a choice.  If you choose to have children, raising them should be your concern – your employer should not be mandated to “care”.  If you are valuable enough as an employee, perhaps you can find an employer who will value your parenting of your children.  Such employers are often religious, though – which can be a problem for some people who call themselves “feminists”.

Most husbands still view child care and household chores as women's work, even when those women are working full time.

Again, women tend to marry men who earn more than they do, and those men often work more than full-time hours.  I tend to think a division of labor is a good idea, but if both the man and the woman are working full-time outside of the home, they should try to evenly split the housework.  However, I don’t think they should have children if they are both working so much.  And any woman who shacked up with the guy before they got married should know about his domestic habits and what he is likely to do.  It is stupid of her to marry him if she isn’t happy with the arrangements.

Stressed and resentful, the majority of women nonetheless continue to work, many out of financial necessity.

Then you’d support lowering taxes so that one income would be enough for most families?  When you consider the extra taxes, the costs of commuting, wardrobe, daycare, etc., how much does the second income really help?

Both working mothers and stay-at-home moms have good reason for resentment, but it's the latter group that is most at risk.

Yes, men, who often work until they die and die younger than women and often lose access to their kids and half of everything they’ve worked for… they have no reason for resentment.

Although our culture tends to romanticize full-time motherhood, forgoing an independent income can make mothers and their children profoundly vulnerable to economic hardship, among other problems.

If a breadwinner dies, divorces his wife or becomes unemployed, homemakers often cannot find decent jobs to support their families.

Uh, that’s what alimony, child support, and insurance are for.  Prenuptial agreements can help, too.  Women who stay home are more likely to avoid divorce if they have chosen their husband carefully, treat him well, and stay faithful.

But even among women who enjoy stable marriages with employed spouses, many wives who give up their careers to stay home are also angry.

I’d be angry, too, if my head was filled with the junk found in so many magazines, daytime television, and romance novels.

While researching a book about the dangers of economic dependency and the rewards of work, I interviewed a woman who had wanted to be a lawyer since she was in second grade. As a successful commercial litigator, she regarded stay-at-home wives with disdain - until she had children and found that her employer's unforgiving demands made it impossible for her to continue to excel at her own job, and that her husband's heavy travel schedule and brutal work hours made it equally impossible for him to share the child-care duties with her.

"It was horrible," she said. "My husband understood my stress level, but his answer was, 'Then you leave work.' It was my problem."

So she became a stay-at-home mother, even as she continued to seethe about the sacrifice she had been forced to make.

You write as though fathers don’t have to make choices.  Do you think most men are working in their dream jobs?  Some men a stuck in their jobs because they have a wife and kids to support and supply benefits to.  Even if the wife is in a career, how long is she likely to put up with a husband is leaves a steady job to chase a dream?  Some men have a dream job that means long hours, lots of travel, and/or networking in social environments – often things he has to give up for the sake of his marriage and fatherhood.  Too often men succumb to the pressure to get married before they’re ready, and end up stuck on what was supposed to be a stepping-stone.  There are other sacrifices men make to be fathers.

But their resentment often festers just below the surface of their lives, erupting into full-blown rage at the slightest provocation. Sometimes it's directed against their husbands for not sharing the domestic burdens in a remotely equitable manner. Often, however, this anger is directed against other women, as in the vicious back-and-forth of the so-called Mommy Wars.

You are delusional if you think such women would a) not be prone to erupting into full-blown rage; and b) not attack each other - if this issue didn’t exist.  There's always something - even if it is really nothing.

Since publishing my book, I have been pilloried in print and in cyberspace by hundreds of enraged stay-at-home mothers who have attacked everything from my appearance to my marriage and children.

That’s rich, coming from a woman who ambushed a prominent stay-at-home-mommy advocate  - Dr. Laura - with a hatchet piece.

Why do any of us accept the fact that childless women earn 10% less than their male counterparts, or that women with children earn 27% less, or that single mothers earn up to 44% less?

Do you know why?  Because the earning gap is a lie, at least a lie when attributed to gender discrimination.  These stats usually take these groups as a whole, instead of matching them job to job, hour to hour, at the same employer.  For example, men are more likely to work risky jobs.  A woman working as a secretary is not going to earn the same amount as her boss.  A woman who comes into work late, leaves early, or doesn’t come in at all  - to take care of her kids is taking time away from work – notice that single mothers seem to earn the least.  If a job involves commission or pay raises can be negotiated, the person with more testosterone is likely to earn more.  Overall, a woman will make the same amount as a man in the same job, working the same hours, doing the same quality and amount of work.  If your statistics told the whole story, employers would only hire only single mothers because they could get the same work done for less money.  Should a single mother secretary who comes in late, and leaves early get the same paycheck as the manager who is in early and leaves late and works the occasional weekend?

Can any of us defend the fact that women's standard of living drops by 36% after divorce, whereas that of men rises by 28%?

I don’t know where you get that statistic, but let’s assume it is true.  Do you think it might have something to do with child custody?  I find this figure dubious, though.

We put up with elected officials who pay lip service to family values but do little or nothing to address the real needs of American families, from flexible work schedules to affordable, quality child care.

Why can’t you work that out with your employer?  Why does someone else have to do it for you?

Mother's Day would be an even happier occasion if it didn't leave so many women feeling that their most important concerns had been kissed off by a greeting card holiday.

So you won’t accept gifts or cards?  You know, some husbands bust their butts to make Mother’s Day a special day, agonizing over arrangements and gifts when he’d rather spend the money on his car.  And what does he get?  Angry ranting from a woman who seems upset that women have a uterus and men don’t.

Kids need to be raised by their parents.  If you are so concerned about women and employment, then encourage women to let their husbands stay home and raise the kids.  Most women, though, find such an arrangement intolerable.  They prefer to be with their children, and they prefer to be married to a man who earns more than they do and can take care of them, and lose respect for him if he doesn’t, especially if he doesn’t work at all.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive