Posted by
Playful Walrus on Monday, June 09, 2008 12:26:24 PM
I’ve been meaning to do more analysis of the recent coverage of the marriage licensing issue and California Supreme Court ruling. I will be blogging on numerous articles and opinion pieces from the last few weeks. It may look like overkill, but that’s because there has been overkill in the MSM coverage as Leftist and homosexual journalists gleefully celebrate.
Almost of my source material is from the Los Angeles Times, which has an obvious and demonstrable bias in favor of the positions of homosexuality activists and people with gender identity confusion. Some such people who are in positions of power at the paper promote themselves openly as people who are in these categories and in favor of neutering marriage.
I should also point out that I believe “same-sex marriage” to be an oxymoron, but it is still a better term than “gay marriage”. Presumably, two straight men can get a marriage license together just the same as a two gay men, right? The law deals with sex, as in gender, not feelings. However, assuming that one grants that two men can marry each other in the true sense of the word, that does not mean it should follow that 1) the state should issue same-sex couples marriage licenses or that 2) this change should be imposed by judges.
This matter will reach federal courts and the Supreme Court of the United States. That makes electing a President who will nominate the right judges all the more important.
Please also see these relevant blog entries:
The Religious Right: Marriage Requires a Man & a Woman
Why Marriage Matters
Marriage Is Dead – Part I of II
Marriage Is Dead – Part II of II
Activists' Next Step: Marriage Equality – Again
California Court Refuses to Stay Marriage Licensing Overhaul
Three Recent Observations on the California Marriage Issue
Believe Marriage Unites a Bride and Groom? You Bigot!
See also:
GaysDefendMarriage.com