Posted by
Playful Walrus on Wednesday, November 05, 2008 6:32:20 PM
Yes, it is time for Wednesday quarterbacking.
As with the elder Bush losing in 1992, and Bob Dole losing in 1996, Senator John McCain’s loss yesterday was not a rejection of conservatism.
McCain was the GOP nominee because he was the most unlike Bush, and Bush, rightly or wrongly, has been effectively trashed in the populace. We knew Bush wasn’t a consistent conservative before he got the nomination in 2000. He’s proved it in his Presidency, and although there has been much he has done right, there have been things that he’s done wrong, or ineffectively, including public relations. McCain ran against Bush in 2000. In a year where Bush was unpopular, choosing McCain was seen as perhaps the only way to get a Republican elected President.
Unfortunately, McCain had a hard time winning over the GOP base. His campaign finance reform, which has obviously been ineffective in removing the influence of money from campaigns, had left conservatives with a bad taste in their mouths. Many conservatives and others were also upset with his work on the shamnesty bill for illegal aliens. Instead of having a nominee who offered a clear difference from Obama in that regard, we had McCain. And did it help him or anyone else in the GOP with Latino voters? No! So he lost some of the base and independents, and didn’t gain Latinos.
While McCain touted federalism in some areas that weren’t a major focus in this election, he failed to articulate truly conservative or libertarian positions clearly enough or early enough in the general campaign. That’s because in many areas, he couldn’t without disavowing his own votes and previous positions. Instead, he tried to play Santa Claus. But a Republican can never outpromise the Democrats. The Democrats will always promise more goodies. So to a lot of people, McCain appeared to be doing the same thing Obama was doing – only halfway. And they thought – why go halfway when we can get the genuine (new) deal? Why go for someone who is always "reaching across the aisle" when we can pick someone who is already across the aisle?
People who want Democrats will vote for Democrats, not Republicans.
McCain also lost because he wanted to run a nice, respectful campaign that would be applauded by the MSM once it was over, instead of running a campaign that would win. For far too long, he was busy disavowing comments from his own supporters instead of focusing on the weaknesses of Obama.
He lost not because of choosing Palin as his running mate, but by not letting Palin be Palin.
Obama doesn’t have all that much experience, but he had enough –and recent - experience organizing people to get out the vote, and then getting to higher and higher offices. He's good at getting the vote, but we don't have any reason to believe he can actuall govern. The MSM was already on Obama’s side, but he knew how to work them all the more. He is more photogenic and a smoother speaker. He can talk for hours and not say anything. This allowed him to avoid really dealing with the facts that he was low on experience, low on accomplishment, and prone to extremist associations and thinking.
Finally – McCain lost to Obama because of racism. It wasn’t just African-Americans who voted for Obama in part or in whole because of the color of his skin. And that’s racism. There is no way around it.
What we need now is for Republicans to be Republicans. We need them to fight for limited government, federalism, and sticking to the Constitution. We need them to fight for fiscal responsibility. And we need them to start organizing NOW for 2010 and 2012. Start identifying, grooming, and promoting ethical, effective people for local and state offices, as well as Congress and President. If you contribute money to any Republican organizations, instead of donating in bulk, donate small amounts. Donate when they do something right, and refrain from donating when they get it wrong, and let them know why.
We need not surrender to socialism.