About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Iowa Should Say Show Me the Money

Iowans are being told, just like Californians were, that there's a positive side to the court forcing the neutering of their marriage licenses.  That positive is an economic boom to the state by same-sex couples rushing there to get "married".

Yessiree, why, just look at what great financial shape California got in to last year because we had court-forced neutered marriage licensing.  An estimated 18,000 same-sex couples obtained such licenses in California last year.  Meanwhile, the state slipped into a massive debt of dozens of billions of dollars, prompting "emergency" meetings of the legislature, and massive tax increases for an already highly-taxed state.  Can we please see some evidence that California was helped?

There is nothing that says that someone who gets a state-issued marriage license in California (nor Iowa, I would imagine) must spend any more money than the license processing fee in that state.  People can come in, get the license, be "married" by an official in a bare-bones ceremony, then hold their reception somewhere else.

Really, these claims that the state will benefit economically by selling its soul are a pathetic attempt to still the stirrings of the outraged majorities, who understand that marriage unites the sexes and that it is not the place of courts to change state licensing in the first place.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The 10 Big Lies About America by Michael Medved

I recently read The 10 Big Lies About America: Combating Destructive Distortions About Our Nation by Michael Medved.

Talk radio host, author, and media & culture critic Michael Medved has an encyclopedic knowledge and recall of American history and politics.  He is featured right here on Townhall.com.

His most recent book is the kind you can carry around with you or keep on your coffee table if you want to see the Leftists in your life go into fits.  Students should especially be given copies, although the corresponding rise in the blood pressure of instructors might be costly to health plans.

As the title implies, Medved tackles ten all-to-commonly-believed notions about the United States of American that crumble in when countered with the facts.

Here they are:

America Was Founded on Genocide Against Native Americans - Debunks the notion that a paradise of peaceful people were wiped out by an unprovoked and concerted genocidal effort on the part of colonists from Europe and their American descendants.  Possible Leftist response: Europeans were still wrong to invade the continent (but of course, it is okay for other people to invade now).

The United States is Uniquely Guilty for the Crime of Slavery, and Based Its Wealth on Stolen American Labor
- Points out that Americans deserve more credit for reducing slavery around the world than blame for perpetuating it; slavery was not a boon to the American economy.  Possible Leftist response: Americans were still wrong to engage in slavery and thus we still have a debt to pay.

The Founders Intended a Secular, Not Christian, Nation – Shows that the founders, while not intending a theocracy, saw this nation as a Christian one and did not separate faith, prayer, and religious activities from government proceedings, policies, and facilities the way today’s most ardent separationists insist is Constitutionally mandated.  (Medved is a observant Jew.)  Possible Leftist response: That was then, this is now.  Besides, those people were genocidal slavedrivers (see above).

America Has Always Been a Multicultural Society, Strengthened by Diversity – Points out that, unless you believe that one Christian denomination is an entirely different culture from another, America has been an assimilating nation, not a multicultural one for most of its existence, and multiculturalism has a dismal record around the world.  Possible Leftist Response: Current immigration trends necessitate multiculturalism.

The Power of Big Business Hurts the Country and Oppresses the People - Shows that big business has provided much more benefit to Americans than any harm, empowering the individual and helping to improve our quality of life.  Possible Leftist response: It isn't worth it because big business owners get richer than most of us, and that's not fair.

Government Programs Offer the Only Remedy for Economic Downturns and Poverty
– Shows that government programs actually make economic downturns worse and create more of a problem than they solve.  This is especially relevant right now!  Possible Leftist response: We can count on our government, which has the power of force, and in the past has been genocidal, racist, and a perpetuator of slavery (see above), to be less corrupt and better at handling things than a market that relies on freedom, personal choices, and voluntary interactions.

America Is an Imperialist Nation and a Constant Threat to World Peace
– Shows that while America has participated in many wars, it has been decidedly non-imperialist, especially in comparison to most of the world and has promoted peace.  Possible Leftist response: But we're too powerful, automatically making things unfair, just like when someone is really rich and I'm not.

The Two-Party System Is Broken, and We Urgently Need a Viable Third Party – Medved draws upon his keen understanding of political history to show that Democrats and Republican parties have changed over the years, while ideals being championed by third parties tend to make those ideals less prominent in the major parties instead of more prominent.  Possible response from third-party member: It doesn’t matter – the principle of purity matters more to me than winning.

A War on the Middle Class Means Less Comfort and Opportunity for the Average American – Demonstrates that quality of life has improved, and that people who leave the middle class are much more likely to do so by moving upwards than downwards.  Possible Leftist or protectionist response: I have it harder than my parents.  I mean, they didn't have to deal with where to place the big screen hi-def TV, or where to park all of the cars, or how to keep so many rooms clean.

America is in the Midst of an Irreversible Moral Decline – Demonstrates this notion goes back to the earliest days of the country, and that cultural indicators shift back and forth, instead of constantly declining.  Medved is optimistic.  This "lie" comes mostly from the Right, especially the Religious Right.  Those whose eschatology (the study of "last things" or end times) holds that the world as we know it will soon end after a dramatic increase in evil are likely to be unconvinced by Medved, though there are orthodox Christian theologians who do not believe a total moral collapse is destined to precede the "end of the world", or that we can’t have decades, centuries, or millennia yet ahead of us full of moral advancements and retreats.

All in all, it is a great book that I can strongly recommend.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Only Obama Can Save Us From Our Doom

The MSM continues to do everything it can to lower expectations for the Obama Presidency and let Obama slip away from his campaign promises.  Associated Press writer Liz Sidoti provides the latest example, depicting Obama as heroically facing impossible challenges.
President-elect Barack Obama, relatively young and inexperienced, is facing a rapidly growing list of monumental challenges as he prepares to take the reins of a nation in turmoil.
"Inexperienced".  Notice they use that world now.
"I do not underestimate the enormity of the task that lies ahead," Obama said after his historic election a little more than a month ago.
Oh, good.  So all of those campaign promises should still be considered good.  And every Presidential election is historic.
Not only is Obama saddled with lingering wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that he is inheriting from President George W. Bush, but he also must deal with:
Things are going quite well in those wars, which is why we don’t hear much about them from the MSM anymore.
a deepening recession in the U.S. and a spreading global economic crisis.
There isn’t much a President can do to improve the economy, other than sign legislation and budgets that lower taxes and reduce government interference in business.  The President can do much to make he economy worse.
an automotive industry on the brink of collapse and soaring national debt.
Wait a second.  The whole auto industry is not on the brink of collapse.  Many auto companies are doing just fine.  What is on the brink of collapse is the UAW’s ability to demand things nobody else gets.
increasing unemployment and its ripple effects.
The only jobs a President can create are governmental.
the threat of terrorism amid a historic transfer of power.
What?  I thought everything was hunky dory so we didn’t need to worry about that?  Isn't that why we voted for Obama instead of McCain?  So that people would like us?!?
At the same time, Obama may be drawn into an unfolding political scandal over Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's alleged efforts to trade the president-elect's former Senate seat for personal gain. The ongoing federal investigation could ensnare some of his top advisers and taint the self-styled reformer who has tried to steer clear of notorious Chicago politics.
Oh, brother.  This is written like innocent advisors will be unfairly brought down because of the misdeeds of others.  And Obama didn't steer clear of Chicago politics – he used them to get where he is.
Some priorities may fall to the wayside or be done piecemeal.
In other words, don’t expect him to keep his promises, which were the very things that helped him beat HRC and McCain – not his experience.
But, so far, he has signaled an intent to move forward on much if not all of those plans.
Actually, no, he hasn't.  He’s talked about not raising taxes on "the rich" after all, and not even letting Bush’s tax cuts expire.  He's moved away from changing our Iraq policy, even keeping the Secretary of Defense in place.
Comparatively, Obama has been on the national stage for a short time.
He is inexperienced!
Most historians liken the situation facing Obama to that which confronted Roosevelt - but the comparison does not seem to do justice to the colossal challenges Obama is facing.
It’s the end of the world!  Only Obama can save us!
With each new bit of bad economic news, he makes his views known — though he always is careful to defer to Bush when it's decision time.
Uh, he doesn’t really have a choice.
Politically, with things so bad, Obama can claim any change for the better as a success. If the economic and security situation deteriorates further, he can rightly say he inherited a mess.
So either way, expect him to be re-elected.  All of the good stuff will be his doing, all of the bad stuff will be Bush's fault.  The MSM will insist that Obama will need more time to really make everything work out well.


Previously: One Way to Win in 2010 and 2012
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Example of Lowering Expectations For Obama

Obama's people are doing everything they can to lower expectations and to get people to forget Obama's promises and what they thought Obama was promising.  Here is another example.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LA Times Joins in on Getting Obama Off of the Hook

Here's another article trying to set things up so that Obama can gracefully escape the high expectations and campaign promises.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Already Lowering Expectations For Obama

Terence Hunt of the Associated Press gets started on lowering expectations for the Obama administration with the story, "President-elect Obama Faces Daunting Challenges."
His name etched in history as America's first black president-elect, Barack Obama turned Wednesday from victory's jubilation to the sobering challenge of leading a nation in crisis.
There’s that magic word again.  You know, I was able to buy a house AND get two other new lines of credit opened up in the middle of this "crisis".  Why?  BECAUSE I PAY MY BILLS!  I can pay my bills because I don’t buy stuff I can’t afford.
Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level or as an executive,
Now you’re just being racist.  At least that is what we were told when we talked like that before the election.
Ending an improbable journey that started for Obama a long 21 months ago, he drew a record-shattering $700 million to his campaign account alone.
And some of it is from legal donations, too!  Say, where are all of those people who were complaining about money buying the elections four and eight years ago?  They’ve been really quiet this time around.  I wonder why?
Naming the staggering list of problems he inherits - two wars and "the worst financial crisis in a century," among them - Obama sought to restrain the soaring expectations of his supporters.
Finally getting to the wars – yeah, things are looking up because we did things the way McCain wanted.  And this is hardly the worst financial crisis in a century.  We’re not even in Carter territory yet.  But notice that the start and end of that sentence is designed to start carefully backing away from the promises made during the campaign.
A tide of international goodwill came Obama's way on Wednesday morning, even as developments made clear how heavy a weight will soon be on his shoulders.
Well, duh.  It is the Presidency.  This isn't voting for who will win on American Idol.
Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat and leading player in the civil rights movement with Jackson, said on NBC's "Today" show: "He's going to call on us, I believe, to sacrifice. We all must give up something."
Okay.  But I will not have as much money to spend on things that support union employees.
"It is not a mandate for a party or ideology but a mandate for change," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.
In that case, how about some real change like libertarianism and federalism?
The son of a Kenyan father and a white mother from Kansas, the 47-year-old Obama has had a startlingly rapid rise, from lawyer and community organizer to state legislator and U.S. senator, now not even four years into his first term.
That’s a really nice way of saying he is an affirmative-action President, and we shouldn’t expect too much from him.  After all, he’s going to be spending a lot of time learning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Last Minute Prop 8 Stuff in Los Angeles Times

From Jessica Garrison's latest article on Prop 8 comes this:
Many argued, as former President Bill Clinton did in a taped call to millions of registered voters in the days before the election, that the measure was discriminatory because it would strip rights from gay couples and treat them differently from heterosexual couples.

"If I know one thing about California, I know that is not what you're about. That is not what America is about. Please vote "no" on 8. It's unfair and it's wrong," Clinton said.
If that is an accurate description, I would say Clinton is lying.  Big surprise.  But that’s okay, because this is "about sex", at least in their view, and that makes it okay to lie.  Same-sex couples who are domestic partners are treated as spouses by the state.

But it is interesting that the man who signed the federal Defense of Marriage Act into law is doing this.  What changed?  Well, if there is anyone I don’t want to listen to when it comes to marriage, it is Bill Clinton.

Karin Klein mocks the genuine outrage that the Yes on 8 campaigners (and a lot of other people who are decent) have for the last-minute dishonest ad that depicts Mormon missionaries performing a home invasion at a lesbian’s couple’s home.
The ad, which debuted on YouTube and is going out on television today, is certainly the most attention-getting TV spot to criticize the proposition. Most of the ads against Proposition 8 have been extraordinarily tame, unlike the fear-mongering rumors spread by the Yes side.
Not that any of the folks at the Los Angeles Times - where a man who writes for the sports pages was recently given a platform to write about "becoming a woman", only to return to work back with his original masculine name after a short amount of time of "being a woman"  – have a bias on this issue.  (And, of course, everyone has to call the guy whatever he wants, or face sexual harassment and discrimination charges.)
Having viewed the ad, I can't see what the big deal is.
I wouldn’t either, if I didn’t know the difference between something public and that requires the consent of someone else - like state-issued marriage licenses - and private behavior that does not impose on anyone else.  Opposing a court decision about state-issued licenses is in no way similar to invading someone's home or private life.

There is a reason the marriage neutering side waited until the last minute to release this ad.  It would be exposed as a hateful, lying piece of propaganda if there was any more time for it to be exposed more widely.  The ad is ridiculous.  Prop 8 won’t give anyone, let alone the LDS church, the ability to prevent people from living together, committing to each other, making vows, exchanging and keeping rings, or considering themselves married.

The Yes on 8 side could put out a more truthful ad if they had one depicting a cross-dressing marriage neutering activist locking arms with a power-hungry judge and toppling over a voting booth with a Prop 22 supporter inside, taking away the voting rights of others.  Voting is a long-established right.  Getting a state-issued license for anything isn’t.

VOTE YES ON PROPOSITION 8. 
Don't let these hateful people who devalue masculinity and femininity, mothers and fathers, and bash religious people discourage your vote!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disgusting Ad Against Prop 8

One of the late-in-the-game "No on Prop 8" television ads is one that essentially compares Prop 8 to the internment of Americans of Japanese descent during WWII, segregation, and, of course, banning interracial marriage.

This is shameful and diminishes some read injustices of the past.

Prop 8 will not hurt anyone.

It will not make it legal to assault, harass, or discriminate against homosexual people based on their sexual orientation.  It will not lead to homosexuals being segregated or put into internment camps.

It will not prevent a homosexual person from living where he or she wants to, loving the person of their choice, living with the person of their choice, having a religious "marriage" ceremony, making vows and commitments, exchanging rings, or obtaining state recognition akin to being spouses via domestic partnership.

Not being able to get a marriage license with someone of the same sex is no more of a denial of rights than not being able to get a business license with someone else.  The people of a state have a right to set the licensing standards.  We will not infringe upon your rights.  Do not infringe upon ours.

We are not asking homosexual people to stand in the back of the bus.  Homosexual activists are coming on to the bus we’ve been riding for millennia and are telling us we need to remove the wheels and turn it into a lounge because some get motion sick.  One need not ride the bus if one doesn’t want to. But don’t tell us to change the bus.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »