About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

LA Mayor Proposes Convoluted Housing Plan

Former Clinton shill and current Obama shill Tony Villar wants to be sure the more successful among us are forced to help the less successful to live as though they were more successful.  Los Angeles Times staff writer Jessica Garrison reports.
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa on Monday will unveil a $5-billion, five-year plan to build housing for the poor and middle class.
That’s the opening sentence of the story.  Why is the mayor of a major city announcing such a plan?  Isn’t it the job of developers to create housing?
The blueprint, which calls for thousands of new homes along subway and bus lines, and developments with people of all incomes living together, would, according to the mayor's deputies, alter the look and feel of the city forever.
Ah yes.  The attempt at social engineering that places rich people and poor people together.  I wrote about that before here.
But the plan, which many City Council members and business and housing groups said they had not yet seen, is being released while the housing market is a shambles, the state is facing a massive budget shortfall and the economy is teetering -- challenges that lead some to wonder whether it is feasible.
If it was feasible, wouldn’t developers do it on their own?
"I know that budgets are tight . . . credit is almost nonexistent," Villaraigosa said Saturday to a room full of community and labor groups pushing for more affordable housing. "But we're going to reject the cynics . . . and build a brighter future for those kids who are in the corner over there."
Ah, there are the key words… “affordable housing”.  I wrote enough about that phrase here.
The mayor got a standing ovation at the union hall near downtown Los Angeles, and chants of "Si, se puede" ("Yes, we can") from the dozens of people in matching red T-shirts in his audience.
Maybe if they learned English, they could afford better housing?
Some developers object to a so-called mixed-income provision that would require [subsidized] housing to be included in new housing developments. They say that such a policy -- which labor and housing groups have been pushing for years -- would cast a pall over entrepreneurial efforts.
Exactly.
"It is going to make housing less affordable for everybody," said downtown activist Brady Westwater.
Bingo.
On the other hand, community and labor groups, key players in the city's politics, are lobbying hard for the so-called mixed-income plan.
Of course they are.  They are socialists who want other people to pay for their lifestyle.
Los Angeles was designated the least affordable metropolitan area in the country last year, according to the Business Council report, because so many people pay so much of their incomes for housing.
Well how can that be?  We’ve had rent control for many years?  If that really worked, shouldn’t housing in the area cost less?
The city also has the largest homeless population in the nation.
I’m sure that has nothing to do with the climate.
In addition, although private developers have built many high-end apartment units and condos over the last few years, there has not been a similar increase for households earning less than $75,000 per year.
So what’s next?  Forcing Rolls Royce to put out cheaper models?  When someone upgrades to new, more expensive housing, that means they are no longer living where they used to – and that will most likely make the vacated residence more affordable… especially if a lot of high-end units are built.  It’s called… the market.
Under the mayor's plan, the city would pledge $200 million a year for five years from various sources, including the city's Housing Authority, its affordable housing trust fund and its Community Redevelopment Agency, to build affordable housing.
Doesn’t anyone else see the contradiction in calling something that costs $200 million per year “affordable”?  And that's just the city's amount.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racist Group Gets a MSM Pass

B. Hussein Obama, who is an African-American, was praised by LA Mayor, Latino, and Adulterer Tony Villar, at a conference of the racist subversive organization La Raza.  Los Angeles Times staff writer Phil Willon reports.
In his address to thousands attending the National Council of La Raza conference, Villaraigosa criticized the Bush administration for what he called its "selective enforcement" of immigration laws.
Yeah, is Bush not going after those hordes of Swedish illegals?  I do agree that enforcement should be more broadly enforced.
He said that the federal government should focus its efforts on "criminals instead of working people," and that current enforcement practices unfairly tear families apart and punish small businesses.
Uhm, someone who has entered or stated in the country illegally is a criminal.  Families can be re-united in the home country.  Law enforcement always separates.
Before introducing Villaraigosa to the thousands attending the conference Saturday, La Raza President Janet Murguia urged members to be respectful of both candidates, reminding them that La Raza is a nonpartisan organization.
You forgot the “wink, wink”.
He said 12 million illegal immigrants can be brought "out of the shadows and into the light, and onto the tax rolls by electing Barack Obama."
They are hardly in the shadows.  Marching in public marches isn’t hiding in the shadows.

McCain is talking to the racist group today.  Too bad the paper doesn’t identify them by their racism, as they would with many other racist organizations.  And why do these speakers assume that just because someone is Latino they want illegal aliens to get amnesty?  That sounds like stereotyping to me.  Nice to see Villar doing everything but running the City of LA.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LA Mayor Avoids Using Starter Pistol

Los Angeles Mayor Tony Villar apparently didn't want to be photographed holding a starter pistol at a swimming pool publicity event.  You know, because someone might mistake him for a law enforcement officer, or something, and who would want that?

He has no problem being photographed speaking encouraging words to crowds of illegal aliens exercising protest rights we would not enjoy in their country, or making a mockery of marriage.  Ah, but being photographed with a useful and legal tool - can't have that!


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Today’s California Marriage Coverage

Jennifer Dobner of the Associated Press notes that the LDS (Mormon) church is not staying silent in the fight over marriage neutering in California.
A letter sent to Mormon bishops and signed by church president Thomas S. Monson and his two top counselors calls on Mormons to donate "means and time" to the ballot measure.
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech – in practice.
In May, California's Supreme Court overturned a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, saying gays could not be denied marriage licenses.
Sloppy language.  There was no “ban”.  We simply affirmed that we wanted to continue to issue marriage licenses to bride-groom couples.  Gays were never denied marriage licenses.  Couples without a bride or without a groom were denied marriage licenses, but they could still have ceremonies, draw up contracts, make commitments, live together, etc.  In California, they could register to receive the same state-mandated conditions as marriage.
"The church's teachings and position on this moral issue are unequivocal. Marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and the formation of families is central to the Creator's plan for His children," the four-paragraph letter states.
Yep.  Even though the LDS church leadership doesn’t realize that the Bible is an overtly and clearly monotheistic book, they can at least understand this.
The latest letter is a disappointment to members of Affirmation, an international support group for gay, lesbian and transgender Mormons.
You know, if they really were a support group for Mormons, they would help people to be celibate outside of marriage, recognize that marriage always unites a bride and a groom, and they would encourage people to dress appropriately and not have perfectly healthy organs removed.

I wonder if there are international support groups for heterosexual Mormons who feel like fornicating?

Mormonism means accepting the Bible and three other books as Scripture, and in the authority of the church leadership.  If you don’t, why identity as Mormon?  If you do, then you have to accept that marriage unites the sexes and that sex outside of marriage is a sin.  You might as well have a group called "Vegetarians for Meat Eating".
Last month, Affirmation called on the church not to meddle in California politics.
Why shouldn’t the church get involved?  We still have freedom of religion and speech in this country, for the most part.
"This initiative will hurt so many people," executive director W. Olin Thomas said in a statement Monday.
The court hurt me when it disregarded my vote and forced me to neuter the marriage licenses I issue.  The only way this amendment will hurt people is if they wrongly based their feelings on a neutered marriage license that the court has wrongly mandated.
"The California law affects civil marriage; it has no effect on any religious institution or official."
Wrong.  It most certainly has an effect - on their employment practices, adoption arrangements, and more.
Affirmation leaders are scheduled to meet with the head of LDS Family Services, a church social services agency, in August to begin a conversation meant to bridge the divide between Mormonism and gay members hurt by church teachings that homosexuality is a sin.
Great.  When do similar meetings start with straight fornicators?  Typical Leftist tactic: “If they just meet with us and talk with us, they’ll agree to do what we want.  If they don’t they’re a bunch of meanies!”

Hey, since the LDS church adds to their scripture and is still receiving what they claim to be revelation, even if it contradicts the Bible, it is always possible that they will change their views on sexuality and marriage.  I just don’t see it happening anytime soon, given how bride-groom family is very central to their main doctrines and practice.

Mayors and known adulterers Gavin Newsom (San Francisco) and Tony Villar (Los Angeles) are attending to the really pressing problems in their cities by participating in brideless or groomless “marriage” ceremonies.

David Zahniser and Phil Willon, Los Angeles Times staff reporters, provide some of the details.
"The California electorate is coming into a new age realizing that [neutered] marriage is an institution that supports family values, and it's certainly one I support," Villaraigosa said. "I certainly respect people of faith who disagree. I also respect the law, and I'm sworn to uphold the law."
Yes, but you aren’t required to perform ceremonies.

Kerry Cavanaugh provides the coverage in the Daily News.
Villaraigosa was deputized to perform marriages by the Los Angeles county clerk before the ceremony, and he is cleared to officiate weddings through Oct. 31.
The whole thing is so absurd and such a mockery of marriage and a democratic republic.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LA Mayor Out and About Stumping For Hillary

The Los Angeles Times Staff Writer Duke Helfand has this piece on Mayor Tony Villar, officially know as Antonio Villaraigosa (Raigosa being his ex-wife’s name).  This guy tries to be the Latino Obama.  He is usually constantly at photo ops and tries to smooth through everything.  As if the City of Los Angeles Mayor didn’t have enough to do already, he tried to take over the Los Angeles Unified School District, which includes many other cities in addition to L.A.

Lately, though, he’s been out of the city a lot, stumping for Hillary Clinton.  You need to know about this guy, because if he’s going to try to be the Governor of California (Hillary will no doubt campaign for him if she is President), or will try to get a position in a Clinton administration.
For more than 2 1/2 years, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has been the public face of Los Angeles, appearing in one neighborhood after the next and often leading the nightly news.

But over the last two months, he has devoted noticeable time and energy to a cause outside the city. By today, the mayor will have spent 18 of the last 65 days on the road for presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) -- visiting Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and Texas as the primary election season has intensified.
I wonder if Obama will take him in should Hillary bow out?
Deputy Mayor Sean Clegg said Villaraigosa views the Clinton campaign as an investment in the city's future. A Democratic president, the mayor believes, would concentrate money and attention on the needs of big cities.

"The mayor said it many times: This is the most important presidential election in his lifetime," Clegg said.
Isn’t that always the case?  It’s like saying “This year’s group on American Idol is the most talented ever!”, or “The most shocking rose ceremony ever!”
Villaraigosa has become one of Clinton's most loyal and effective voices on the stump, a prominent Latino politician who has drawn crowds in Las Vegas, San Antonio and other heavily Latino areas. Since October, he has visited Nevada five times, Iowa three times, Texas twice and New Hampshire once, according to a schedule provided by his office.

His tireless efforts have not gone unnoticed by Clinton, who singled out Villaraigosa after she won Nevada's Democratic caucuses in January. The mayor has been talked about as a potential Cabinet nominee in a Clinton White House, although he has said privately that he has no interest in such a job.

On the stump, Villaraigosa travels with a press deputy from his City Hall staff and members of the Los Angeles Police Department security detail that accompanies him around the clock whether he is in the city or away.

The mayor's office said the Clinton campaign covers the cost of flights and hotels for him and his press aide, but the two pick up their food expenses. The city typically pays the travel, hotel and food costs for the LAPD officers, according to police spokeswoman Mary Grady. On three occasions in the fall, the Clinton campaign paid hotel and airfare expenses for the officers before those involved realized that the city covers the costs.

The two press aides who trade off campaign swings -- Matt Szabo and Janelle Erickson -- use their vacation time as well as personal cellphones on the trips because they are barred by city and state law from engaging in political work on the job.

It’s all scratch my back, and I’ll scratch yours.

I’m so happy that I don’t live or work in the City of Los Angeles.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »