About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

On Promoting a Limited Government GOP

We have a two party system.  Yes, although there are times where Democrats and Republicans are too similar, there are many times when the differences are clear.  Third parties were irrelevant in the 2008 Presidential Election, despite the wariness of libertarians and many conservatives about the GOP nominee. It will be better to reform the GOP than build a whole new organization, so I favor working towards a GOP that consistently promotes limited government through conservatism, free market capitalism, and federalism.

One of the difficulties we have is that we’re electing people into positions of power, and then hoping they will vote themselves less power.  It is very tempting for someone to attempt to the use the force of government to "do something”"to make a perceived ill better, or to spend money taken from others.  Still, I believe it is possible to elect people who will restrain themselves and each other, bringing true reform, focusing on protecting our actual rights.

It should not be the role of our government to attempt to cure every social and moral ill through a law or a government program.  It is possible to elect people who understand that and will fight for limited government, but we have to work hard and work well to do it.  We can't just have candidates who are committed to limiting government – we have to get them elected and hold them accountable in order for them to be able to do any good.

Here are some of my other entries relevant to this issue:

Why Do People Vote Democrat?

Why McCain Lost

One Way to Win in 2010 and 2012

More Ways to Win in 2010 and 2012

Winning the Voters

Why Social and Fiscal Conservatives Belong Together in the GOP

Different Republican Camps Need Each Other

Conservative Christians Must Have Sensible Priorities

Conservatives Can’t Influence If They Sit on Their Hands

Six Lessons Republican Politicians and Pundits Need to Learn

Is the Battle Lost?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Libertarian Dreams Are Nice

...but we need to deal with reality.

We don’t live in a libertarian country.  Any move towards a libertarian policy needs to be weighed against what will remain "non-libertarian", at least until it gets addressed, too.

For example, I think people should be free to offer their services on a daily basis unencumbered, and anyone who wants to hire them should be able to do so, unencumbered.  And it really doesn’t matter to me at all if that person who is being hired is here legally or not.  But I also think that 1) there should be a lot less public property – places where day laborers tend to congregate; 2) there should be stronger private property laws, so that if someone wants to host day laborers, they can (AND they can set the conditions, such as “no littering”), and if others want them off of their property, they can remove them; 3) government should not regulate the workplace (aside from actual crimes like fraud), nor collect payroll taxes; 4) there shouldn’t be tax-funded public assistance programs and thus no illegal aliens getting my tax money; 5) there should be separation of state and school, so that I can choose whether or not to pay for the education of the children of illegal aliens; 6) the federal government should control of the national borders so that terrorists, criminals, and their tools don’t make it here.

Under those conditions, the complaints that many people have about day laborers would be addressed.

Libertarians often argue that even illegal aliens greatly contribute to our society, because of their inexpensive labor.  I heard this once from a libertarian guest on KFI’s John & Ken Show.  The hosts couldn’t believe it; they kept describing how illegal aliens were ruining neighborhoods, schools, and other things.  The hosts and the guest were kind of talking past each other.  Although I understood what was going on, the conversation never got to the point where the guest explained that in “his” world, the negatives of illegal aliens would be largely eliminated – in his world, the schools and roads and such are private property and not funded by taxes or controlled by government bureaucrats, and illegal aliens don’t get public assistance.  That’s something the hosts didn’t seem to catch, and something the guest never explicitly explained.

In a libertarian world, there are no tax-funded schools, so it doesn’t matter how many illegal aliens are in our schools.  In a libertarian world, infrastructure is paid for by users, not by taxpayers.  In a libertarian world, there are no social welfare programs paid for by taxes.

Take another example - “drugs”.  I would find legalizing them more tolerable if I have the right to freely fire (or not hire in the first place) someone who does them, and to protect myself and my property from someone who is high, and if I had other libertarian freedoms, such as not paying for the health care of druggies.

Legalizing prostitution is more tolerable if I can own the sidewalk in front of my business and bar streetwalkers from standing there.

Get the picture?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »