About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Are Political Petitions Private?

As homofascists seek to harass and intimidate marriage defenders, one of the many legal questions that has arisen has essentially been, as David G. Savage and Carol J. Williams report in the Los Angeles Times:
Is signing a petition and delivering it to the government a public act, like voting on a bill in the legislature or contributing money to a campaign? Or is it more like casting a secret ballot at the polling place?
In the case of Washington State, the Supreme Court of the United States has sought to protect marriage defenders, siding more with the "secret ballot" side.

Marriage neutering activists, however, are eager to get their hands on names of marriage defenders:
Toleos said, "We don't ask people to go confront strangers. This is about finding someone they already know -- a cousin, a friend and co-worker -- and having a civil dialogue."
A civil dialogue? More often then not, when someone I've known has encouraged me to join with them in a move to neuter marriage, and I've declined, no matter our history, the person has been likely to unleash expletive-laden tirades attacking me personally. They insist that me not subjugating my own convictions to their personal desires is akin to hating them and bidding them ill. By the way, I decline their invitation without disparaging or expressing any disapproval of homosexual behavior or the person.

The mainstream news media has reported targeting of marriage defenders and retaliation against them. Considering the bias most of these newsrooms have demonstrated in sympathy towards the marriage neutering cause, where are the reports of marriage neutering advocates being targeted by marriage defenders? Don't see a lot of that, now do we? Just imagine we behaved as they have behaved. The ACLU would be calling for the Justice Department to get involved.

It would be a shame if we all balkanized and retreated into enclaves, only working for employers who agreed with us, only using businesses where everyone agreed with us, only living in neighborhoods where everyone agreed with us, quizzing our friends on their votes and cutting them off if they didn't swear on a stack of chocolate they voted our way. If we are truly to be a tolerant society, we're going to have to exist together.

If I see a bumper sticker that indicates the driver is a marriage neutering advocate, I have no inclination to be any less polite to them than I would be to anyone else. Can marriage neutering advocates reading this say the same thing about learning someone is a marriage defender?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are You Ready For Post-Christian America?

Christians in this country have had things relatively easy compared to most of the world through most of history.  We haven’t had to meet in secret under threat of death, we haven’t had to take up arms to defend ourselves from invading armies or hordes of Muslims, barbarians, pagans, or atheists.  We haven’t had politico-sectarian strife as in the British Isles.  Since the time of Christ’s earthly ministry, Christians have had to face the wrath of Jewish establishment authorities, oppressive pagan governments, violent pagan hordes, Islamic armies and terrorists, and atheist iron-fisted governments.  While we are right to stick up for our representation in our national, state, and municipal heritages, and our right to self-government under this Constitution, we hardly have faced the oppression that so many of our brothers and sisters have faced.  In turn, we did not force everyone in the nation to adopt Christianity, and in general, while some identifying themselves as Christians have been clumsy or annoying in the behavior, people have generally enjoyed broad freedom.

That’s because this has been, in a sense, a Christian nation.

Okay, whenever someone claims that we are or were a “Christian nation”, someone else is likely to declare that most of our founding fathers were Deists and not Christians.  Those who want us to shut up will often cite “low” church membership rolls in comparison to total population in the early days of our nation.  But in those days, being a “member” of a church typically meant that one not only attended that church regularly, but had undergone baptism and/or confirmation into that church, regularly tithed to that church, and practiced, as far as anyone knew, the morals and doctrines of that church – violation of which would mean not being a “member” until repentance and restoration  Rolls were also likely to only include the head of the household.  The pews certainly contained many more souls, and the influence of the church extended strongly beyond its walls.  The naysayers will cite some actual or perceived historical injustices or evils as evidence that we’ve never been a Christian nation.  These people can’t tell us why those things are wrong, only that they believe or feel them to be wrong, or at least contradictory to Biblical teaching…which they don’t believe anyway.

By referring to the U.S.A. as a “Christian nation”, I don’t mean that there were never injustices or evils or mistakes in our history – just like when I call myself a Christian, I don’t mean I’ve never done (and never do) unchristian things.  Certainly slavery as practiced in America was unchristian, as were actions by anyone who denied the humanity and human rights of Africans and African-Americans.

By “Christian nation”, I mean that we are a nation of individuals who have traditionally identified ourselves as Christians or affiliated with a Christian church; a nation where Christian churches are the most prominent religious institutions dotting the landscape; where you can glance at our founding documents, the writings and speeches of the founders, legislation, court decisions, proclamations, public art, marketing, and other media through most of our history and find citations from, references to, and allusions to God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ; where churches and preachers have held significant influence in public opinion; where most people publicly used and accepted basic tenets of the Bible or lessons from Biblical texts; where the Bible was used in public instruction; were the prominent academic institutions, hospitals, and charities where expressly implementing a Christian mission; where in the halls of government or academia, or in the workplace, a person could loudly and unapologetically lead a group prayer, or appeal to Christ; where the religious aspect of holidays and cerebrations were not downplayed; where crèches were common on city land around Christmas; where mottos, seals, and artwork on public buildings openly paid homage to the Christian foundations of that institution or the local or state or federal government.

The major movements and changes were accomplished with sturdy appeals to the Bible
– the exploration and colonization of the land, the American Revolution, the Emancipation, the fight against Nazi Germany and its conspirators, standing our ground through the Cold War, the fight for civil rights.  Even those who currently fight to neuter marriage licensing often misappropriate “judge not” and “love your neighbor” from the Bible.

But even as most people in the country still identify themselves as Christian (or cite Jesus or the Bible as some authority), we are becoming a post-Christian nation through the tyranny of the minority and the apathy and cowardice of those who are supposed to be salt and light.

We allowed a clause in the Constitution that was meant to prevent the adoption of one denomination as the national religion to be used to slowly but surely remove our heritage and our free exercise of our religion from the public square, to divorce our governing from natural law. Perhaps out of complacency and in a botched attempt to be welcoming to the immigrant, to be fair and tolerant and “nonjudgmental” to the atheists and hedonists as well as anyone who believed differently, we allowed the aggressive secularization of our society the degradation of our culture, and the enshrinement of license as a “right”.  Maybe we went along with it because of our own materialism.  In the process, we have trampled on our basic rights to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of association, and to do with our property and our labor what we will, as long as it wasn’t destructive.

We thought the family and church and its charities too constricting, personal responsibility and self-reliance too scary, raising our own children too burdensome, and now we are settling into the clutches of the nanny state, which gains more power the less moral and responsible its citizens, the less those citizens believe their rights and obligations - and those of everyone else - flow from God.

So out goes the Bible, the cross, prayer, and the Ten Commandments.  Out goes discernment, sound reasoning, shame, and humility.  Out go the moral constraints on sexual behavior.  Out goes the expectation of marriage as a lifetime commitment uniting a man and a woman to care for each other and their children ahead of their own wants.  Out goes valuing human life, in comes using human beings for our own convenience and and dispensing of other human beings when they are inconvenient.

In our churches, we’ve allowed another Jesus and another gospel.
  We reward people like Oprah as they recast Jesus and his teachings in a philosophical mold that is based on Eastern religious concepts antithetical to the Bible.  Their “Christianity” demands nothing of them.  It does not ask that they change their behavior.  Yes, most Americans say they believe in God or a unifying spirit, but many don’t believe that such a being has authority over their lives, or at least they don’t act like it.  After all, if we’re confronted with our sins, we cover ourselves with moral relativism, twisting Scripture (“judge not!”), and appealing to evolution as an explanation.  We want God there at the wedding, at the hospital bed, and the funeral - but not in the wallet, or the marriage, or the bedroom.

So get ready for post-Christian America, where rights are granted – and can be abridged – by the government which is not "of, by,  and for the people" but rather an elite class, and we “can’t” govern by Christian principles.  Heck, Christians are being told they shouldn’t even vote by their personal convictions.

We can see how far we’ve come. Years ago, for example, our current President was ridiculed for citing Jesus Christ as his favorite philosopher.  Yet Thomas Jefferson, whose “wall of separation” phrase in a letter has been misused by such people, compiled and presented a codification of Jesus’ moral teachings.

Right now, they’ve got enough people believing that tolerance means we can’t do anything with which they are uncomfortable.  But we are already seeing that where they gain power, they won’t even practice the true meaning of tolerance.  Those who live by their Christian principles will not only be marginalized, they will be kicked out of the classroom, fired from the job, and successfully prosecuted and sued in the courtroom.  I wonder if we’ll get to the point where killing a Christian will be okay, as long as you can cite that they expressed “hate speech fightin’ words” by affirming Christian morals, making someone else feel “threatened”.

Are you ready for post-Christian America?

Related post: Are You Really a Christian?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »