About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Larry Lopez Facing Felony Charges

Dan Weikel and Shelby Grad bring us some good news in this LATimes.com blog entry.
Felony charges have been filed and an arrest warrant issued for a well-known Orange County political activist suspected of committing election and voter registration fraud, the California secretary of State's office announced Wednesday.

Investigators in the agency's election-fraud unit said Nativo ["Larry"] V. Lopez, 57, of Santa Ana leased office space in Boyle Heights and registered to vote using that address although he lived with his family in Orange County. They also say Lopez, president of the Mexican American Political Assn., cast an illegal ballot in L.A. in the 2008 presidential primary.
I'm shocked.  Shocked!
The Los Angeles County district attorney's office, which is working with the secretary of State, charged Lopez with four felonies: fraudulent voter registration, fraudulent document filing, perjury and fraudulent voting. A warrant was issued for his arrest and bail was set at $10,000. The offenses carry penalties of up to three years in prison.
Oh please please please let that happen.  Larry is a "community organizer" racist victicrat who wishes he was the brown Al Sharpton.  He defends things like cockfighting on "cultural" grounds.  He advocates shamnesty and supports socialist causes.

"Rosalio Munoz" wrote on June 25, 2009 at 08:18 AM, taking the usual Larry Lopez route:
This smells of racism.
Yes - whenever you are proven wrong or are busted doing something wrong, cry racism.

"Very simple" wrote on June 25, 2009 at 10:48 AM:
As a 3rd-generation Angeleno and Latino, people like Nativo are disgusting. When my grandparents immigrated here legally, they waited their turn and did it the proper way. They also made a point to learn English and try to assimilate as much as possible.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abandon This Neighborhood

A parolee who apparently went on to rape girls and murder four police officers was celebrated by some slimeballs in Oakland.  The Associated Press brings us the article thanks to Juliana Barbassa, Lisa Leff, and Don Thompson.
Dozens of supporters gathered for the evening march, organized by International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement. Participants were led to a police substation within sight of two locations where Lovelle Mixon shot the veteran officers. Mixon, 26, was killed in the confrontation.
Mixon got off too easy.  His death should have been a lot more painful.
Mourners walking through the streets chanted, "OPD you can't hide, we charge you with genocide!"

There were no officers patrolling the march route.
Pull the officers out entirely.  Let the good people either flee or arm themselves and take out the low-lifes themselves.
Mixon's cousin, Dolores Darnell, 26, addressed the small crowd, calling him "a true hero, a soldier."

“This is the real Lovelle," she said, holding a picture of a smiling Mixon with his wife. "We do apologize for what he did to the officers' families. But he's not a monster."
Oh yes he was.  Murdering rapists are monsters.
The event took place a day after a city-sponsored gathering drew about 1,000 people to the crime scene to honor the slain officers: Sgt. Mark Dunakin, 40; John Hege, 41; Sgt. Ervin Romans, 43; and Sgt. Daniel Sakai, 35.
May they rest in peace.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Your Envy and Coveting is Showing

The Los Angeles Times printed some letters in response to their article on Meg Whitman, which I blogged about here.

Carl C. Slate of Sherman Oaks wrote:
It's unremarkable that GOP gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman espouses the fiscal policies that made her wealthy, but astonishing that she remains unaware that these same free-market policies caused the overall economy to collapse into crisis.
Free market policies did nothing of the sort.  People trying to get something for nothing and not doing their research, along with increase government intervention, has caused things to be the way they are now.

Barry Dantzscher of Valley Glen wrote:
Fifty percent of taxes, Meg Whitman points out, are paid by 1% of the people. No wonder I feel so sorry for you poor billionaires. Perhaps if you'd work to more equitably apportion income and wealth, you'd have to pay fewer taxes.
Equitably?  What is equitable apportionment when people have made different choices in their lives?
Until then, Meg, I'll be happy to swap you my tax rate for your wealth.
Mr. Dantzscher, what has stopped you from having the same success as Whitman?  Mostly, it has been your own choices.  Do you think someone just handed Whitman her money?

Since when did it become okay to take more from someone by force simply because they have more?  I'm tired of these envious people.  They are the ones who have empowered Obama to sell out our future generations.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Will Never Be Enough

Since you are reading this, you have been online today – and since you have been online today, or if you turned on a radio or a television set, then you know that we celebrated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day, on the eve of the "historic inauguration" of Obama.  (of course, ALL Presidential Inaugurations are historic, but this one is breathlessly esteemed as HISTORIC because of the pigmentation of Obama's skin).

I am thankful for King's contributions to our society, and I note that he was a REVEREND who constantly appealed to Biblical principles.  Yet, I don't hear the radical secularists denouncing him for this.

However, as I predicted here and here, the election of Obama is not going to stop the victicrats from yelling and screaming about how unfair and racist we all are.  Associated Press writer Deepti Hajela reports.
The focus of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 wasn't what had been accomplished — but rather his view of what still needed to be done.

More than four decades later, King scholars say he would take the same approach at this historic moment — the inauguration of the first black president at a time when the nation is facing its greatest economic crisis since the Great Depression.
I can't wait for them to claim that MLK was concerned about global warming and talk radio without a Fairness Doctrine.
The crisis could widen the already large financial gaps between whites and blacks and make it more difficult to attain King's dream of economic equality in America.
What does that mean?  People are willing to pay more for some goods and services than others – and people buy certain goods and services more often than others.  How that can there be "economic equality" between, say, a plastic surgeon and a part-time library docent?  A dollar from a black hand is just as valuable as a dollar from a white hand.
"I believe that Dr. King would caution us not to rest on the election of a black president and say our work here is done," said Kendra King, associate professor of politics at Oglethorpe University in Atlanta.
Of course.  The work will never be done.  If the work was done, then a lot of people who make their livings stoking racial strife and class warfare would be out of jobs.
While the election of Barack Obama is a huge step toward King's dream of a time when people are judged on the content of their character and not their skin color, economic data shows racial disparities are still pervasive when it comes to financial equality.
Does anyone else find it to be a paradox to extol judging people on their character and not their skin color, and then cite statistics that separate people by their skin color?!?
Going beyond those simple statistics, studies show that economic mobility and the passage of wealth from one generation to another is more of a reality for whites than it is for blacks.
We live in a free country.  In a free country, there is going to be inequality in outcomes.  Notice that people of Asian origin and descent have traditionally faced intense racism in our country, but as a people in general, they have taken advantage of the freedoms we all have and have prospered.  Perhaps there is something to be learned there.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »