About Me

Name: Playful Walrus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Threats Against the President Are Intolerable

A poll by a Facebook user where one of the options is threatening to our President? Really? Thankfully, Facebook managers removed the offensive poll.

Whether these kinds of threats are being made by sincere conservatives/libertarians/dissenters, or whether they are being made by Leftists trying to make those other people look bad, threats against the President as a person are inexcusable. Threaten his political career, say that his legacy will be a negative one - that's one thing. But we are a nation of laws, and we have lawful means of opposing a President's proposals without violence. We have lawful means of removing a President from office - elections, or impeachment/conviction if a President has committed serious crime.

Let us neither sink to the level of threats against the person nor shy away from our duty to stand up for the Constitution and the liberty it was designed to protect. That's true patriotism.

Tags: POTUS   winning  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Townhall Tips

Things are really heating up.  If your elected representatives are hosting an "open house" or a townhall over the next month or two, you can make a difference by attending, and bringing along some friends who are also in that representative's area.  Thank the representative for the things he or she has done that you have liked, and don't be afraid to bring up what you haven't liked and why.

Make the most of your access to your representative, whether we are talking about the President, a Congressman, or a Mayor.

These tips below come from a friend of mine who works with elected officials, is a communications and public speaking expert, and has extensive public relations experience.  He has graciously and anonymously submitted them for publication here on The Playful Walrus.

Prepare:

1) Determine the nature of the event ahead of time.  Are there set topics?  What is the elected representative likely to talk about?  Will they be taking questions and in what format?  Check the website and call ahead if you need to.  If it is going to be at some facility you can access ahead of time, you may want to drop by to get the lay of the land.  Pay attention as you arrive to try to get a feel for the event and the crowd that is showing up.  It will help if you get there early!

2) Dress and groom appropriately (modestly, humbly?).  Right or wrong, people will make some judgments about you by the way you appear.  Remember your accessories – jewelry, pins, buttons, etc. - what do they say about you?

3) Bring a recording device if possible, appropriate to the nature of the event.  Err on the side of bringing something you don’t end up using.  This may help in not only recording the representative’s statements, but also any shenanigans by others such as Leftist activists.

Plan What You May Say Ahead of Time:

4) Consider your audience.  Who are you trying to convince and of what?  The representative? The other attendees?  Those who will see the even replayed via professional or audience media?

5) Refine and practice your talking points.  You may want to develop them based on the representative's usual talking points.  Bring along their own words if need be, such as from campaign materials or speeches.  Prioritize your messages.  What do you want to talk about?  Bailouts?  Judicial appointments? Deficits? Taxes? Obamacare?  Cap and trade? DOMA? National defense? Border control? Fighting terrorists?  Don't ramble and avoid using partisan jargon.  Get your point across as succinctly as possible.

6) Personalize it - tell YOUR story:
"I came to this country legally and became a citizen as soon as I could…"
"My parents came to this country…"
"We left the old country because…"
"I grew up poor, but I’ve made it this far…"
"I worked three jobs at once to get ahead…"
"I work long days and long weeks…"
"I put myself through school…"
"I've worked my way up the ladder…"
"I've built my business…"
"I pay my bills and have been responsible with my money…"
"I am a victim of lawsuit abuse…"
"Because of the tax laws…"
"I am a veteran…"
"I am a homeowner…"
"I am a landlord…"
"I'm a parent…"
"I'm a union member because I don't have a choice, and my union leaders do not speak for me when they…"
"I have invested in…"
"I was adopted…"
"I think my doctor is the greatest…"
"I'm happy with my insurance…"
"I suffered through a crime…"
"I am encountering red tape that is keeping me from…"

Refrain from quoting or paraphrasing a political talk show host, columnist, or author, unless you are trying to get the representative to go on record opposing that statement.  You aren't there because of what Rush said.  You are there because YOU are facing consequences from what the representative is doing.

If You Get the Chance to Speak:

7) Start with "thanks".  Thank the representative and his or her staff for putting this event together and for meeting with you.  Do this even if you can barely stand to be in the same room as them.

8) Secondly, tell the politician what you like about him or her or what he or she has done, even if you really have to look hard to find it.

9) Next, if you voted for this person, say so. 
If you contributed in some other way to the campaign, say so.  They don't want to lose support.  (If you did not contribute or vote in this way, don't mention that.  If they already know you're a staunch supporter of their political rivals, they'll be more dismissive.)

10) It's good to let them know you are angry (if you are), but you're not going to win over anyone by being belligerent.  Explain why you are angry ("I didn't buy a house using a crazy mortgage; I waited until I could actually afford it, and yet I am punished…") and what you plan to do about it.  Point out that you are willing to speak out, write letters, call, blog, text, demonstrate, walk precincts, raise funds, and vote.  Be assertive and tenacious, but polite.

11) Ask questions whenever possible, as mere assertions are easy to ignore.  For example, "Why do you think you need to intrude into my doctor's office, which is what this legislation does?" is better than "I don't want you in my doctor’s office with me."  Questions demand an answer.  Assertions do not.

12) Do not allow a dodge.  Don't be afraid to point out that they didn't actually answer the question, if they didn't. If appropriate, ask for verifiable commitments ("Will you promise us that you will not vote to increase taxes on capital gains?")

13) Don't be hesitant to condemn statements or actions of any disruptive "right wing" folks (quite possibly Leftist imposters) who make a scene there.  You know the type – those who use racist slurs, call for actual inappropriate violence, or assert some bizarre conspiracy theory.

Finally:

14) Don't be dissuaded or intimidated from going or speaking.  Stand up for your rights!

Feel free to share these tips, but please link back to The Playful Walrus.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let's Assume the Birthers Are Right

Let's assume for the sake of discussion that it can be demonstrated that Obama's birth disqualifies him from serving as President.

What then?

Someone still has to take action.  Does SCOTUS?  Does Congress?  Does a Democrat-controlled Congress initiate the impeachment process?

What if it can't be demonstrated that Vice President Joe Biden did anything wrong in connection with this?  Does that mean that Obama is removed and Biden becomes President?  (If Biden is removed as well, doesn't that make Pelosi President?)

Are Obama's actions - the bills he signed into law, the Executive Orders he issued - automatically invalidated, only to have Biden or Pelosi restore them?

Does anyone really believe that Obama is going to be removed, and that it will end up making a difference?

I just don't see it.

What I do see are actions that Congress and the President are taking that I find to be troubling, and I would like to see more resources directed at countering or mitigating those things - offering credible alternatives.  Card check, Obamacare, bailouts, porkulous, cash for clunkers, cap & tax, shamnesty... the general expansion of federal government... these are things we can fight against and make a difference.

We need to make the most of our time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Conservatives Shouldn't Ignore Male Concerns

It's been a while since I've called attention to men who are not content to be punching bags/ATMs/sperm donors for irresponsible women and male-hating feminists, or who simply aren't willing to be the "nice" guy who pays a woman's way through life as she cavorts with bad boys or tries to find herself in a career.

These men are reacting to modern feminism and big government – and those two things are related, there's no doubt about it.  They reject the idea that a man should fulfill traditional roles and meet traditional obligations and expectations while dealing with women who reject their traditional obligations.

These men are aware that most of the MSM, academia, religious organizations, and the workplace are geared towards the sensitivities of women, and often hostile to men, boys, and masculinity.  They are aware that laws, government policies, and courtrooms more often favor women at the expense of men (and children).

Some of these men are godless hedonists, who revel in easy access to fornication that many women now provide outside of any obligation.  Others are devoted followers of Christ who believe that sex is for marriage.  Some fall into some other category.  Most of them, though, are fed up with female dependency on their tax dollars, with women who continue to birth kids out of wedlock, paternity fraud, the child support system wrongfully burdening innocent men, and double standards in sexual harassment and domestic violence issues.

They reject a system and a culture in which a woman can get away with killing their children; in which a woman can all too easily prevent a father from seeing his own children; in which there is a high divorce rate and women are far more likely to file for divorce; in which pre-nup clauses agreed to by an adult woman being represented by an attorney can be dismissed by a judge; in which a wife can discourage and sabotage her husband's career advancement and still claim half of what he earns; in which she can commit adultery, give birth to another man's child, divorce her husband, shack up with her lover, and exact both alimony (for life!) and child support (for her lover's child) from her ex-husband, and get that child support amount increased if her ex-husband remarries.

Whether they call themselves Men's (or Father's) Rights Advocates, marriage strikers, Men Going Their Own Way, or whatever, they are fed up.  It is wrong (but all too easy) to dismiss all of them as women-haters.  While there are some bloggers out there who are the male equivalent of man-hating feminist extremists – with both sides seeing the other sex as inherently the enemy - there are men out there (some married, some fathers, some not) who generally enjoy women and appreciate femininity, but have legitimate concerns about today's world.  Others are simply men who enjoy living alone and don't want to be punished or attacked for doing do.

Disclaimers:
  • I certainly don’t agree with everything these guys say, how they say it.  There is a broad spectrum of expression in these areas.
  • I don't excuse men for their dependency on government, their sins, or their mistreatment of women, nor do I excuse a man if he picks the wrong woman.  But I also do not blame a man for what a woman does.
  • I like that women have real choices in their lives and do not think that ALL women should get married, stay home, make babies, and handle all domestic chores.
  • If you're a guy who got married 40+ years ago and is still happily married (congrats to you), this stuff may be foreign to you or you might not relate to it.  But ask your sons, grandsons, nephews, younger male coworkers, or other young men about the women they are encountering, and the cultural environment when it comes to gender relations and gender politics.  Shifts in the law, economy, and culture in general, while they have made things much easier for guys who just want casual sex, have made it much more difficult for a man who wants a lasting, happy marriage to find the right woman to join him in that goal, and to stick to it.
We owe it to our sons and daughters to inform them of today's realities, and to assess and address the issues as they are today.

One excellent site is Biblical Manhood.  You can get where that guy is coming from by reading his three part series (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3), his New Gender Deal, and his disclaimer about his view of women.   Also of note: Cultural Conservatives and the Religious Establishment Do Not Care About Men.

Other sites of interest (again, I don't necessarily agree with their tone or all of their positions):
Glenn Sacks (a real pro)
The Elusive Wapiti
Triton Unleashed
The Hawaiian Libertarian
Marriage Strike Central
Men Going Their Own Way
Marky Mark's Thoughts

Related content on The Playful Walrus:
Women Have Encouraged the Child-Man
Toxic Bachelors
Marriage Strike
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GOP Big Enough For Powell and Limbaugh

The GOP is big enough for Powell and Limbaugh.  Rush Limbaugh is an entertainer who also informs his audience.  He is not a GOP official.  He is not an elected or appointed representative.  He's a businessman and entertainer and salesman.  Powell is a soldier and statesman.

We can't really know why Powell voted for Obama.  Clearly, that's not a GOP thing to do.  Maybe he has personal problems with McCain.  Many Republicans do.  It is one thing to agree with the campaign platform of someone, and quite another to believe that they will be a better President than someone else.

Powell, or anyone else who believes that:
1. Vigilant national defense has to be one our highest priorities
2. There are few things the government does better than the private sector
3. People should generally be free to enjoy the fruits of their own labor
4. The Constitution and our system of limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, and state rights must be preserved
5. We have a nation of laws, not entitled elites - we, the people have a government, not the other way around

...should feel welcome in the GOP.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Circular Firing Squad

The tired drumbeat of the GOP needing to ditch the "extremists" continues.  Why don't we ever see widespread reports of prominent Democrats complaining about extreme Leftists messing up their party?  It certainly isn't because there are a shortage of them.  Heck, there are Democrat factions whose priorities are in direct conflict with each other, and yet we still don't see them spotlighted in the MSM denouncing each other.

Guess what?  Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter are not going to go away.  Deal with that.   Complaining about their positions, style, or tactics is a waste.  If you claim to be a conservative and want the GOP to succeed, you are better serving your interests by touting what conservatism offers and saying where the Democrats are messing things up.

Don't forget John McCain.  He tried sucking up to the MSM.  He tried "reaching across the aisle".  He tried being the "moderate".  Yes, it got him enough praise and enough of a pass to get the party nomination.  But it didn’t get him elected President, and it wasn't because of extremists.  It was because so many of those people who were praising him during primary season had no intention of supporting him over a Democrat when it came to the election.   Seeking MSM and poll approvals are a false hope, unless all you want is a ego stroke.  If you really want the GOP to gain more offices, then that isn't the way to go.

Follow Reagan's 11th Commandment.
Espouse conservatism.
Point out the flaws of the statist Left.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not All Conservatives Are in the GOP

Nor are a lot of them in "third" parties.  There are some that are registered Democrats, independents, or "decline to state".

Take Tammy Bruce, who has her own radio show but sometimes fills in for Laura Ingraham.  Bruce also writes books and columns and appears frequently on Fox.  Bruce is anything but a GOP shill.  Heck, she's pro-choice, a self-identified feminist (was even President of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW), openly lesbian, and for most of her life was a registered Democrat, working to elect California Senators Feinstein and Boxer, and President Clinton.

Ah, but she is also a proud gun owner, pro-death penalty, and supports waging war against terrorists

Clinton's actions towards his female intern and his feminist supporters, NOW's abandoning of feminist issues for the sake of Leftist unity in the Clinton scandal and the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman helped push Tammy Bruce towards independence.  And while is pro-choice, she points out that having an abortion is nothing of which to be proud – it usually means a woman screwed up, and, despite the ability to abstain or use many different forms of contraception, she got pregnant when she wasn't ready to be pregnant.

So what makes Bruce a conservative?  Her opposition to big government, her championing of individual instead of collective rights, and her support of strong national defense, and her making those things a priority.

So tell me - if Republican became more like Democrats, would Republicans gain any votes from independents like Tammy Bruce?  No way.

There are no doubt many "sleeping conservatives" – people who aren't politically active and rarely vote, but who live conservative values and, if we reach out to them the right way, and if our elected conservatives actually lead or vote as conservatives, will put us into more offices.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Getting Involved and Networking

The Presidential election is ancient history, Obama has been in office for almost a month now, and we've seen a big push towards more socialism.

What are you doing to advance limited government principles?

Since you are here, you are obviously trying to stay informed.

But what are you doing with the information?

Are you persuading your family, friends, and coworkers?

Are you letting your elected representatives know what you want?

Maybe you are thinking about getting actively involved in a campaign?

Now is the time to network.  Now is the time to persuade more people to our point of view.

Help advance limited government principles within the GOP.  Check out your friendly Neighborhood GOP.

Connect to me on Facebook.

Get involved.  You can still make a difference.

Tags: GOP   winning  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Heads I Win, Tails You Lose

It has been quite amusing to hear the calls for a honeymoon period for the B. H------ Obama administration and for unity and unquestioning support for the policies and actions of this administration.  A couple of letters printed in the Orange County Register agree.

Tom Britton of Villa Park wrote:
It is the height of hypocrisy for the political left to now call for political calm, unity, decency and nonpartisan cohesion as Obama takes office. These same left-wing attack dogs with gnashing teeth relentlessly tore at the flesh of George Bush 24/7 for eight years.
Of course the Left doesn't see it that way.  "Listening" and "bipartisanship" mean that everyone agrees with them.  We are obligated to be unified when they are in power.  When conservatives are in power, we are all obligated to question and dissent and resist all efforts.
But unlike the left who often resort to traditional violent and shocking tactics to win their point of view, the world will see the conservatives take their traditional peaceful approach to resolving differences and refrain from disdainful and unpatriotic discourse.
Let us hope so.

Bernard Peters of Placentia wrote:
I'm a conservative and I promise to support President Barack Obama – to the same degree liberals supported President George W. Bush. That seems fair, doesn't it?
That is sure to set off the Obamaniacs.  You see, it is different because Bush is white and beat Al Gore.  So, it can't possibly be the same.

It is very tempting to repay those who have displayed Bush Derangement Syndrome with sarcastic and stinging attacks on Obama, and opposition to everything he proposes.  But while we can vent to each other in private, we should me more careful about how we handle things.  We can win over more new voters and "moderates" who supported Obama by taking the right tone in our evaluations and criticisms.  We need to show that we truly are patriots who seek liberty for all, not cynical anti-Obama hardheads.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Yes, He Will Be My President

For over eight years, we have heard the whining and hysterics and paranoia and derision from the Left about President Bush.

He stole the election!
He actually believes the religion he professes!
He's going to force women into back-alley abortions and make sure they'd never get equal pay for doing the same amount, quality, and level of work!
He's going to end all medical research!
He's going to destroy education and force all the kids to be indoctrinated with young-earth creationism and abstinence preaching!
He's going to destroy the planet with global warming!
He's not going to force other people to provide me with top-notch health care are no cost to me!
He's giving tax breaks to the rich!
He's taking us to war only to enrich a handful of companies!
He's making hurricanes to kill black people and preventing them from leaving areas facing disasters!
He's not listening to or cooperating with Democrats, or other countries – everything is unilateral!
He's going to cancel elections and turn us into a Christianist Theocratic Dictatorship!
He's letting Cheney and Rove run everything!
He let 9/11 happen when he could have prevented it, or was in on it!
He's listening in to my phone calls, reading my e-mails and chat sessions, and going to stick us all in secret prisons and torture us!


Just about every person he nominated was vehemently opposed as one or more of the following:
1. completely inexperienced
2. just a crony
3. just a political hack
4. out of touch
5. extremist
6. the person who was really going to be in control of the whole Presidency
7. incompetent
8. evil

There was no honeymoon, there was no "wait and see".  This kind of thing was how it was from the start.

Sure, most people rallied behind him immediately after 9/11, but that moment was very brief.  Aside from that moment, it has been a constant barrage.

And now, some Republicans are tempted to respond just a little bit in kind now that there is a Democrat President coming in to office.  One way we see this is with calls to "protest" Obama’s inauguration – not picketing like so many unwashed Leftist freaks – but by deliberately not watching and letting others know that they are going to "protest" or "mourn".

I call on my fellow Republicans, conservatives, and defenders of limited government to be respectful of the inauguration.  Regardless of who is being inaugurated, these events are a testament to one of the blessings our founders secured – a smooth and orderly transition of power.  In some countries, bloody coups are pretty much the norm, or corrupt dynasties that crush all potential rivals and rule for decades.

Thank God we live in the U.S.A.

We are a nation of laws, not men. 
Our nation is a collection of fifty states, each a democratic representative republic.  Collectively, our fifty states elected B. H. Obama as President per Constitutional procedure.  We should respect that, because we value doing things in an orderly, lawful way, an unlike too many of our political opponents, we have respect for the office of President and for our Constitution.  Notice that a President on our side wouldn't take his jacket off in Oval Office, while one their side soiled an intern’s dress with a body fluid that shouldn’t have touched another person other than his wife.

Think of the inauguration as a celebration of our Constitution.


I'm no fan of Obama or Biden.  That's obvious from my blog entries.  But as far as we know, there wasn’t enough voter fraud to call their election into question.  They won by unfairly blaming Bush and linking McCain to Bush, by fostering false hopes and wishful thinking and racism, and through massive voter ignorance – but that is all legal and orderly and Constitutional.

DON’T be like so many of our political opponents, who were constantly disrespectful and tacky and whiny and at times downright bizarre.

DO support our President in what he does right.

DO be vigilant in protecting our rights.

DO stay informed, be active, network, encourage, and persuade others towards limited-government thinking and action.

DON’T cast pearls before swine, wasting your breath with hardcore Leftists who will never change, but instead focus on the young and the undecided and the moderates, who will notice the difference in how we react to Obama and how the Left reacted to Bush.

Yes, Obama will be my President, because that is who our country elected.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Promoting a Limited Government GOP

We have a two party system.  Yes, although there are times where Democrats and Republicans are too similar, there are many times when the differences are clear.  Third parties were irrelevant in the 2008 Presidential Election, despite the wariness of libertarians and many conservatives about the GOP nominee. It will be better to reform the GOP than build a whole new organization, so I favor working towards a GOP that consistently promotes limited government through conservatism, free market capitalism, and federalism.

One of the difficulties we have is that we’re electing people into positions of power, and then hoping they will vote themselves less power.  It is very tempting for someone to attempt to the use the force of government to "do something”"to make a perceived ill better, or to spend money taken from others.  Still, I believe it is possible to elect people who will restrain themselves and each other, bringing true reform, focusing on protecting our actual rights.

It should not be the role of our government to attempt to cure every social and moral ill through a law or a government program.  It is possible to elect people who understand that and will fight for limited government, but we have to work hard and work well to do it.  We can't just have candidates who are committed to limiting government – we have to get them elected and hold them accountable in order for them to be able to do any good.

Here are some of my other entries relevant to this issue:

Why Do People Vote Democrat?

Why McCain Lost

One Way to Win in 2010 and 2012

More Ways to Win in 2010 and 2012

Winning the Voters

Why Social and Fiscal Conservatives Belong Together in the GOP

Different Republican Camps Need Each Other

Conservative Christians Must Have Sensible Priorities

Conservatives Can’t Influence If They Sit on Their Hands

Six Lessons Republican Politicians and Pundits Need to Learn

Is the Battle Lost?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Ways to Win in 2010 and 2012

I’ve already blogged about turning new voters who voted for Obama towards Republicans in 2010 and 2012, and some ways we can reach some of the people who vote Democrat.  However, there’s more to keep in mind.

We need to Speak up, Speak Well, and Speak Far and Wide.

Speak Up – Some who voted Left this time simply haven't heard good arguments from our side.  We tend to try to deal with life instead of complaining – going about quietly fixing problems without waiting for the government to do it.  But we now need to speak up and let other people - especially independents and people who don't always bother to vote - know what is going on.  We need to tell them when a new regulation or law or policy change or tax rate negatively impacts us, especially if it will also impact them, even if only by extension.  Some of us have been intimidated by being shouted down by professors or dope-smoking protestors or emotional family members.  We need to face intolerance and ignorance head-on and speak up.  If someone gets angry as us - oh well.  They'll calm down.

Show our fellow citizens when the media and the Left are attacking them and their values.  Show them how things that move us further away from limited government bring negative consequences.

Speak Well – There are effective ways to be persuasive.  Stay focused.  Keep on topic.  Lead things towards their logical conclusion before the subject gets changed.  Part of speaking well is informing your audience.  Perhaps we should be passing out pocket copies of the Constitution with footnotes?  Running television spots talking about Constitutional principles and limited government?

We can't ignore image or neglect the fact that much of our audience will be fickle with short attention spans.  We have to deal with how things are, not as we want them to be.

Speak Far and Wide – We need to use technology effectively to make our case and show it to be stronger than the Left's case.  Engage our fellow citizens in conversations that can make a difference.  The Left is using technology, especially social networking sites.  We need to use every ethical and effective means to reach, keep, inform, and motivate an audience.  Get them hooked on some of your favorite blogs.

We can turn things back towards limited government.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Defending Prop 8 in the Coming Fight

I recommend the people behind Prop 8 document as much of the anger and protesting and whining and frivolous lawsuit filing that is going on right now.  It will come in handy if voters are asked to vote on another amendment on marriage, which will happen if the courts don't intervene first.  Be sure to focus in on the hateful signs and statements by all of the people who do not respect our voting rights, freedom of religion, or rights to raise our own children.

The marriage neutering side will use their positions in Hollywood to make very slick propaganda.  Many on the marriage neutering side have more free time and money, since they are less likely to have children.

While we are trying to go about our lives raising our children with, among other things, respect for both masculinity and femininity and how they interact, and respect for how self-government works, they can take more of their time to protest outside of churches.

We can't let our guard down or miss opportunities, or we'll find our lives being forcibly reordered by a tiny minority and anyone who really doesn't care all that much about marriage, but is afraid of being called a bigot.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Way To Win in 2010 and 2012

So we supposedly had all of these new voters voting in this election, or at least registering to vote in the last 2-4 years.  Some of those people are new to the game simply because of age, and others are new to the game for some other reason – previous disinterest, newly naturalized, or whatever.  For the younger voters, Bush is pretty much all they can remember, because he’s been President for almost eight years and they weren’t really paying much attention before then, let alone during the past eight years.

You’ve probably run into these people at work and on social networking sites, as most of them have publicly gushed about Obama (yet, if you were to talk about what Bush has done right or what you liked about Ronald Reagan or why you liked McCain, they’d accuse you of trying to force your beliefs down their throat).

Many of these people naively voted for Obama because they believed the hype and that what they don’t like about how things are today is primarily Bush’s fault.  Obama has been oversold
They think Obama is going to wave a magic wand and make their lives better.  They think he can create cushy, high-paying new jobs for them, or hand them a prestigious diploma for free, or that he’ll bring about world peace and no American soldiers will be wounded or killed, that he'll end pollution and global warming, make the dolphins and polar bears happy, end racism and homophobia, make abortions a pleasant and painless experience with no negative consequences ever, and give them a big new house for cheap, punish the unfairly rich, cure cancer and AIDS and provide top-notch medical care for free, and everything's going to be just one huge party and lovefest across America and around the world.  He’s going to cure lepers and turn water into wine.

Don't antagonize these people.  Don't call them stupid.  Don't badmouth Obama in front of them.

There are better ways to turn them into the conservative voters of the future.


Show interest in their hopes, their dreams, their expectations, and their thoughts.

Ask them with genuine, sincere interest exactly what it is that they are expecting from an Obama administration – and listen closely, without laughing, rolling your eyes, throwing up your hands, or pulling out your hair.  Don’t interrupt them.  Take notes, mentally or physically, and repeat their expectations back to them to make sure you have them right.  Again, do it with a straight face and as though you are learning something, not judging them.

Don't let them stop with vague generalities, like "Everything will be better".  Ask them for specifics... things like "Obama is going to make sure we all have health care we can afford."  Cite Obama's own words that support their expectations, or the words of some other Democrat – if there are any and these expectations aren’t simply personal fantasy, like when a woman thinks a man who is 50 and has never been married is going to marry her and stay married to her even though they've been shacking up for ten years and he's never shown interest in getting married.

We know Obama won’t be able to do some of the things he’s promised.  We also know that some of the things he's promised, if he does manage to do them, are going to make things worse, not better.

So, our jobs over the next two and four years is this.  We’re going to check in on these new-voter Obama supporters regularly – talking about current events and what is going on – specifically, asking them questions and making sure they're paying attention.  This is very easy on some of the social networking sites – just create our own private, personal group of your friends who haven expressing their euphoria over the election of Obama, and you will be able to send them all the same private message at the same time.  You need not take too much of their time away from reading up on what Paris Hilton is doing.

Give both credit and blame where it is due.  For example, President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, and signed the welfare reform bill.  But make sure you point out the role of Republicans in Congress in bringing those things about that the person likes or that you can demonstrate is an improvement.  Point out examples of how government isn't always the answer by pointing out things that others are doing.  "Hey, did you hear that Company X discovered a way to turn the leg hairs of feminists into clean, alternative fuel?  They did that without government involvement.  In fact, they would have had it ready sooner, but the government slowed them down."  Or, how about, "Hey, did you see Oprah spent about one percent of what she made last year to build that hospital in Africa?  Yeah, no government funds were needed for that."  Point out the good work of businesses and private charities.

Point out to them when and where government is interfering in their lives and limiting their choices, especially if you can trace it back to Obama and the Democrat majority in Congress.

Don’t let them forget their expectations or the promises of Obama and the Democrats, who are already working to try to get people to do just that.

Remember – be gentle and respectful, but firm.  Don’t be nasty and drive them away, but don’t let them wiggle out of the logical conclusions.

These people are going to be getting most of their info from media that is pro-Obama – the dinosaur media, late night jokesters, public radio, People Magazine, etc.  Some of these sources are going to try to attribute any problems or failures to Obama trying to please Republicans and not being Leftist enough.  But sometimes, you can find information in these sources that actually makes our point for us.  It may be buried, they may try to spin it the other way, but carefully analyzing it with your Obama-supporting friend can reveal the truth.

Often, you are going to have to link them to info from sources that favor limited government, federalism, conservatism, libertarianism, and so forth – sources that actually take the Constitution seriously and might even mention now and again that this is the greatest country in the world.  There are plenty of such sources that are clear, calm, and reasonable and avoid taking a tone that turns off those who might not automatically agree at first glance or hearing – sources with a lot of credibility.  If the person has indicated that they voted for Obama, at least partially, because of his parentage/skin color, be sure to use Larry Elder, Walter E. Williams, and Thomas Sowell as sources, among others.

Don’t accept a dismissal such as "Oh, that’s just an Obama hater."  Ask them exactly where and how the source is wrong.  Appeal to them to be open-minded and fair.

Ask them questions like, "Should the federal government be doing this?  Should any level of government be doing this?" (You may want to carry around a pocket copy of the Constitution and ask them to point to the clause that gives that branch of government that power.)  "Isn’t there a better way for this to get done or to address that problem?"  Always focus on how we should be making our families and out country stronger, not weaker, not restricting the freedoms – especially economic freedoms – of our people.  Always point out that the fewer people depending on the government, and the fewer areas of their lives where they are doing so, the better it is for those people and for taxpayers.

Point out how the decisions, new programs, or new regulations impact them, even if indirectly.  Tell them how they are impacting you.  This will especially be effective if these people are your own children or employees.

"Sorry, I have to let you go because my taxes are going up, or ever since taxes went up people have less money to by our goods or services."

"Sorry, we can’t take that trip because we need to pay more in taxes."

Some of these people will get the point as they start to learn more about politics and life in general.  Some of them won’t.  But perhaps more than ever in our history, we have people who voted for Obama and other Democrats who have been set up by the campaigns, by the MSM, and by their own naive sense of entitlement for significant disappointment and disillusionment.  When that happens, we should not let them avoid politics entirely.  We should make each and every one of them one of us.

We can do that, if we have strong, principled Republicans we can point to as the alternatives.

Related: Post-Election Reminders
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »